Human Rights Discourses in Islamic Jurisprudence and International Law: A Comparative Study

Abstract

This research examines the discourses of human rights within Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and international law, focusing on both convergences and divergences in principles, interpretation, and implementation. Drawing on classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources, including the Qur’an, Hadith, and scholarly juristic writings, alongside international human rights instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and related treaties, the study undertakes a comparative analysis of normative frameworks and practical enforcement mechanisms. The research highlights how Islamic legal traditions emphasize duties, ethical obligations, and communal responsibilities, while international law foregrounds universal entitlements and state accountability. By critically analyzing similarities, tensions, and adaptive interpretations, the study argues for a harmonized understanding that reconciles religious principles with global human rights standards, offering insights for policy-making, legal reform, and cross-cultural dialogue.